Review



biotinylated igg  (Novus Biologicals)


Bioz Verified Symbol Novus Biologicals is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Novus Biologicals manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Novus Biologicals biotinylated igg
    Surface staining and flow cytometry analysis performed on PBMCs from healthy control (HC) donors. (A) Representative histograms of FcαR ( red ) and FcγRIIa ( blue ) expression on pDCs compared to mIgG1 isotype control ( grey ), with detection by the same secondary antibody. (B) Paired analysis between monocyte and pDC FcαR (left) and FcγRIIa (right) surface staining (n=12 HC donors). (C) Binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed using <t>biotinylated</t> human heat-aggregated IgA or heat-aggregated IgG and fluorescently labeled streptavidin for visualization by flow cytometry, Streptavidin (SA) alone ( grey ), heat-aggregated IgA ( red ) and heat-aggregated IgG ( blue ). (D) Direct ex vivo binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed by staining with anti-IgA ( red ) or anti-IgG antibody ( blue ) directly ex vivo. Control ( grey ) has no anti-IgA or anti-IgG detection antibody. ( A-D ) Staining was performed on thawed PBMCs and pDCs gated as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2B. (B) Ratio paired t-test (**** p<0.0001).
    Biotinylated Igg, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 12 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated igg/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 93 stars, based on 12 article reviews
    biotinylated igg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Lupus IgA1 autoantibodies synergize with IgG to enhance plasmacytoid dendritic cell responses to RNA-containing immune complexes"

    Article Title: Lupus IgA1 autoantibodies synergize with IgG to enhance plasmacytoid dendritic cell responses to RNA-containing immune complexes

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2023.09.07.556743

    Surface staining and flow cytometry analysis performed on PBMCs from healthy control (HC) donors. (A) Representative histograms of FcαR ( red ) and FcγRIIa ( blue ) expression on pDCs compared to mIgG1 isotype control ( grey ), with detection by the same secondary antibody. (B) Paired analysis between monocyte and pDC FcαR (left) and FcγRIIa (right) surface staining (n=12 HC donors). (C) Binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed using biotinylated human heat-aggregated IgA or heat-aggregated IgG and fluorescently labeled streptavidin for visualization by flow cytometry, Streptavidin (SA) alone ( grey ), heat-aggregated IgA ( red ) and heat-aggregated IgG ( blue ). (D) Direct ex vivo binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed by staining with anti-IgA ( red ) or anti-IgG antibody ( blue ) directly ex vivo. Control ( grey ) has no anti-IgA or anti-IgG detection antibody. ( A-D ) Staining was performed on thawed PBMCs and pDCs gated as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2B. (B) Ratio paired t-test (**** p<0.0001).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Surface staining and flow cytometry analysis performed on PBMCs from healthy control (HC) donors. (A) Representative histograms of FcαR ( red ) and FcγRIIa ( blue ) expression on pDCs compared to mIgG1 isotype control ( grey ), with detection by the same secondary antibody. (B) Paired analysis between monocyte and pDC FcαR (left) and FcγRIIa (right) surface staining (n=12 HC donors). (C) Binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed using biotinylated human heat-aggregated IgA or heat-aggregated IgG and fluorescently labeled streptavidin for visualization by flow cytometry, Streptavidin (SA) alone ( grey ), heat-aggregated IgA ( red ) and heat-aggregated IgG ( blue ). (D) Direct ex vivo binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed by staining with anti-IgA ( red ) or anti-IgG antibody ( blue ) directly ex vivo. Control ( grey ) has no anti-IgA or anti-IgG detection antibody. ( A-D ) Staining was performed on thawed PBMCs and pDCs gated as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2B. (B) Ratio paired t-test (**** p<0.0001).

    Techniques Used: Staining, Flow Cytometry, Control, Expressing, Binding Assay, Labeling, Ex Vivo



    Similar Products

    93
    Novus Biologicals biotinylated igg
    Surface staining and flow cytometry analysis performed on PBMCs from healthy control (HC) donors. (A) Representative histograms of FcαR ( red ) and FcγRIIa ( blue ) expression on pDCs compared to mIgG1 isotype control ( grey ), with detection by the same secondary antibody. (B) Paired analysis between monocyte and pDC FcαR (left) and FcγRIIa (right) surface staining (n=12 HC donors). (C) Binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed using <t>biotinylated</t> human heat-aggregated IgA or heat-aggregated IgG and fluorescently labeled streptavidin for visualization by flow cytometry, Streptavidin (SA) alone ( grey ), heat-aggregated IgA ( red ) and heat-aggregated IgG ( blue ). (D) Direct ex vivo binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed by staining with anti-IgA ( red ) or anti-IgG antibody ( blue ) directly ex vivo. Control ( grey ) has no anti-IgA or anti-IgG detection antibody. ( A-D ) Staining was performed on thawed PBMCs and pDCs gated as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2B. (B) Ratio paired t-test (**** p<0.0001).
    Biotinylated Igg, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated igg/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    biotinylated igg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems anti human igg isotype
    Surface staining and flow cytometry analysis performed on PBMCs from healthy control (HC) donors. (A) Representative histograms of FcαR ( red ) and FcγRIIa ( blue ) expression on pDCs compared to mIgG1 isotype control ( grey ), with detection by the same secondary antibody. (B) Paired analysis between monocyte and pDC FcαR (left) and FcγRIIa (right) surface staining (n=12 HC donors). (C) Binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed using <t>biotinylated</t> human heat-aggregated IgA or heat-aggregated IgG and fluorescently labeled streptavidin for visualization by flow cytometry, Streptavidin (SA) alone ( grey ), heat-aggregated IgA ( red ) and heat-aggregated IgG ( blue ). (D) Direct ex vivo binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed by staining with anti-IgA ( red ) or anti-IgG antibody ( blue ) directly ex vivo. Control ( grey ) has no anti-IgA or anti-IgG detection antibody. ( A-D ) Staining was performed on thawed PBMCs and pDCs gated as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2B. (B) Ratio paired t-test (**** p<0.0001).
    Anti Human Igg Isotype, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human igg isotype/product/R&D Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human igg isotype - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Novus Biologicals biotinylated human igg isotype control antibody
    Surface staining and flow cytometry analysis performed on PBMCs from healthy control (HC) donors. (A) Representative histograms of FcαR ( red ) and FcγRIIa ( blue ) expression on pDCs compared to mIgG1 isotype control ( grey ), with detection by the same secondary antibody. (B) Paired analysis between monocyte and pDC FcαR (left) and FcγRIIa (right) surface staining (n=12 HC donors). (C) Binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed using <t>biotinylated</t> human heat-aggregated IgA or heat-aggregated IgG and fluorescently labeled streptavidin for visualization by flow cytometry, Streptavidin (SA) alone ( grey ), heat-aggregated IgA ( red ) and heat-aggregated IgG ( blue ). (D) Direct ex vivo binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed by staining with anti-IgA ( red ) or anti-IgG antibody ( blue ) directly ex vivo. Control ( grey ) has no anti-IgA or anti-IgG detection antibody. ( A-D ) Staining was performed on thawed PBMCs and pDCs gated as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2B. (B) Ratio paired t-test (**** p<0.0001).
    Biotinylated Human Igg Isotype Control Antibody, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated human igg isotype control antibody/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    biotinylated human igg isotype control antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Novus Biologicals biotinylated human igg1
    (A) DMF-differentiated HL60 cells expressing FcγRIIA (HL60–2A) treated with β-glucan exhibited decreased affinity for hIgG-coated RBCs in the presence of LacCer C24 compared with LacCer C16 or vehicle. Non-specific binding as measured with RBCs without hIgG was negligible. (B) Lyn knockdown HL60–2A cells (Lyn-1) showed increased affinity for hIgG-coated RBCs compared to scRNA control in the presence of β-glucan but not in dextran. (C) SHP-1 knockdown HL60–2A cells showed similar results as Lyn-1 knockdown cells, with the addition of β-glucan leading to increased 2D affinity of knockdown cells for <t>IgG.</t> Conversely, there was a significant drop in affinity upon SHP-1 knockdown in the presence of dextran control. All measurements in (B) and (C) were in the presence of LacCer C24. Non-specific binding controls without hIgG are shown. A c K a values represent ligand-receptor density normalized adhesion frequencies. Data are average ± SD, and individual values are plotted. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 using an unpaired Student’s t test.
    Biotinylated Human Igg1, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated human igg1/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    biotinylated human igg1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Novus Biologicals biotinylated human igg
    a Overview of the detection of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion by flow-cytometric bead array. Streptavidin-coated microbeads with different fluorescence intensities are conjugated with recombinant <t>biotinylated</t> viral antigens (RBD, S1, and N) and mixed and incubated with pre-diluted serum samples together with control beads. After incubation, microbeads are washed and stained with anti-human IgG and IgM secondary antibodies, washed, and acquired on a flow cytometer for downstream analysis. Schematic created using BioRender.com. b Dot plots showing the staining patterns of positive (red) and negative (black) control beads with secondary anti-IgG-PE, anti-IgM-BV421, or both. The signal corresponding to IgG-PE (top) and IgM-BV421 (bottom) is shown for each column. c Histogram showing the distribution of the microbeads based on their intrinsic fluorescence on the APC channel. Each colour represents the coating for each microbead. d Representative dot plots showing the specificity of the staining pattern of recombinant anti-RBD IgG (left) or anti-N IgG (right) antibodies.
    Biotinylated Human Igg, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated human igg/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    biotinylated human igg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Surface staining and flow cytometry analysis performed on PBMCs from healthy control (HC) donors. (A) Representative histograms of FcαR ( red ) and FcγRIIa ( blue ) expression on pDCs compared to mIgG1 isotype control ( grey ), with detection by the same secondary antibody. (B) Paired analysis between monocyte and pDC FcαR (left) and FcγRIIa (right) surface staining (n=12 HC donors). (C) Binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed using biotinylated human heat-aggregated IgA or heat-aggregated IgG and fluorescently labeled streptavidin for visualization by flow cytometry, Streptavidin (SA) alone ( grey ), heat-aggregated IgA ( red ) and heat-aggregated IgG ( blue ). (D) Direct ex vivo binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed by staining with anti-IgA ( red ) or anti-IgG antibody ( blue ) directly ex vivo. Control ( grey ) has no anti-IgA or anti-IgG detection antibody. ( A-D ) Staining was performed on thawed PBMCs and pDCs gated as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2B. (B) Ratio paired t-test (**** p<0.0001).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Lupus IgA1 autoantibodies synergize with IgG to enhance plasmacytoid dendritic cell responses to RNA-containing immune complexes

    doi: 10.1101/2023.09.07.556743

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Surface staining and flow cytometry analysis performed on PBMCs from healthy control (HC) donors. (A) Representative histograms of FcαR ( red ) and FcγRIIa ( blue ) expression on pDCs compared to mIgG1 isotype control ( grey ), with detection by the same secondary antibody. (B) Paired analysis between monocyte and pDC FcαR (left) and FcγRIIa (right) surface staining (n=12 HC donors). (C) Binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed using biotinylated human heat-aggregated IgA or heat-aggregated IgG and fluorescently labeled streptavidin for visualization by flow cytometry, Streptavidin (SA) alone ( grey ), heat-aggregated IgA ( red ) and heat-aggregated IgG ( blue ). (D) Direct ex vivo binding of IgA and IgG to pDCs was assessed by staining with anti-IgA ( red ) or anti-IgG antibody ( blue ) directly ex vivo. Control ( grey ) has no anti-IgA or anti-IgG detection antibody. ( A-D ) Staining was performed on thawed PBMCs and pDCs gated as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2B. (B) Ratio paired t-test (**** p<0.0001).

    Article Snippet: To generate aggregated IgA or IgG, biotinylated IgG (Novus NBP1-96855) or IgA (Novus NBP1-97181) was heated at a concentration of 2 mg/mL for 35-45 min at 65 C. After live dead staining, heat aggregated antibody was diluted in staining buffer to a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL, incubated with PBMCs for 30 min at 37C.

    Techniques: Staining, Flow Cytometry, Control, Expressing, Binding Assay, Labeling, Ex Vivo

    (A) DMF-differentiated HL60 cells expressing FcγRIIA (HL60–2A) treated with β-glucan exhibited decreased affinity for hIgG-coated RBCs in the presence of LacCer C24 compared with LacCer C16 or vehicle. Non-specific binding as measured with RBCs without hIgG was negligible. (B) Lyn knockdown HL60–2A cells (Lyn-1) showed increased affinity for hIgG-coated RBCs compared to scRNA control in the presence of β-glucan but not in dextran. (C) SHP-1 knockdown HL60–2A cells showed similar results as Lyn-1 knockdown cells, with the addition of β-glucan leading to increased 2D affinity of knockdown cells for IgG. Conversely, there was a significant drop in affinity upon SHP-1 knockdown in the presence of dextran control. All measurements in (B) and (C) were in the presence of LacCer C24. Non-specific binding controls without hIgG are shown. A c K a values represent ligand-receptor density normalized adhesion frequencies. Data are average ± SD, and individual values are plotted. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 using an unpaired Student’s t test.

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: Inhibitory affinity modulation of FcγRIIA ligand binding by glycosphingolipids by inside-out signaling

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109142

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) DMF-differentiated HL60 cells expressing FcγRIIA (HL60–2A) treated with β-glucan exhibited decreased affinity for hIgG-coated RBCs in the presence of LacCer C24 compared with LacCer C16 or vehicle. Non-specific binding as measured with RBCs without hIgG was negligible. (B) Lyn knockdown HL60–2A cells (Lyn-1) showed increased affinity for hIgG-coated RBCs compared to scRNA control in the presence of β-glucan but not in dextran. (C) SHP-1 knockdown HL60–2A cells showed similar results as Lyn-1 knockdown cells, with the addition of β-glucan leading to increased 2D affinity of knockdown cells for IgG. Conversely, there was a significant drop in affinity upon SHP-1 knockdown in the presence of dextran control. All measurements in (B) and (C) were in the presence of LacCer C24. Non-specific binding controls without hIgG are shown. A c K a values represent ligand-receptor density normalized adhesion frequencies. Data are average ± SD, and individual values are plotted. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 using an unpaired Student’s t test.

    Article Snippet: SA-coated RBCs were then incubated with 20 μg/mL biotinylated human IgG1 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1–96855) for 1 hr at 15°C while shaking.

    Techniques: Expressing, Binding Assay, Knockdown, Control

    (A) DMF-differentiated HL60 cells expressing FcγRIIA (HL60–2A) were treated with vehicle or C24, dextran or β-glucan, and isotype or functional blocking FcγRIIA antibody (IV.3) as indicated. Cells were seeded on immobilized BSA-anti-BSA under static conditions and stained with phalloidin. The area of spread cells and representative images are shown. (B) DMF-differentiated HL60, HL60–2A with scRNA, Lyn shRNA-1 (Lyn-1), or Lyn shRNA-2 (Lyn-2) were evaluated as in (A). (C–E) Human neutrophils (C), HL60–2A cells (D) pretreated with C24 and β-glucan, or HL60–2A cells with indicated shRNAs (E) were treated with IV.3 followed with luminol and anti-mouse F(ab’) to induce cross-linking (XL), and ROS generation (relative light units [RLUs]) was monitored over time. Representative plots (left) and the peak level of ROS (right) for each condition that was normalized to the average of the F(ab’) untreated control are shown. (F) HL60 cells expressing wild-type FcγRIIA (WT) or FcγRIIA ΔITAM mutant were treated with LacCer C24 and β-glucan, dextran, IV.3, or isotype control as indicated and incubated with IgG-opsonized fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-latex beads. Phagocytic index (percentage of FITC-positive cells over total cells) analyzed by FACS is shown. Bar graphs represent fold change compared to vehicle + dextran for (A), native for (B), and WT + dextran for (F). Dotted line represents the value of untreated HL60 for (A), (B), and (F) and no F(ab’) control for (C), (D), and (E). Data are average ± SEM, and individual values are plotted. *p < 0.05 using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: Inhibitory affinity modulation of FcγRIIA ligand binding by glycosphingolipids by inside-out signaling

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109142

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) DMF-differentiated HL60 cells expressing FcγRIIA (HL60–2A) were treated with vehicle or C24, dextran or β-glucan, and isotype or functional blocking FcγRIIA antibody (IV.3) as indicated. Cells were seeded on immobilized BSA-anti-BSA under static conditions and stained with phalloidin. The area of spread cells and representative images are shown. (B) DMF-differentiated HL60, HL60–2A with scRNA, Lyn shRNA-1 (Lyn-1), or Lyn shRNA-2 (Lyn-2) were evaluated as in (A). (C–E) Human neutrophils (C), HL60–2A cells (D) pretreated with C24 and β-glucan, or HL60–2A cells with indicated shRNAs (E) were treated with IV.3 followed with luminol and anti-mouse F(ab’) to induce cross-linking (XL), and ROS generation (relative light units [RLUs]) was monitored over time. Representative plots (left) and the peak level of ROS (right) for each condition that was normalized to the average of the F(ab’) untreated control are shown. (F) HL60 cells expressing wild-type FcγRIIA (WT) or FcγRIIA ΔITAM mutant were treated with LacCer C24 and β-glucan, dextran, IV.3, or isotype control as indicated and incubated with IgG-opsonized fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-latex beads. Phagocytic index (percentage of FITC-positive cells over total cells) analyzed by FACS is shown. Bar graphs represent fold change compared to vehicle + dextran for (A), native for (B), and WT + dextran for (F). Dotted line represents the value of untreated HL60 for (A), (B), and (F) and no F(ab’) control for (C), (D), and (E). Data are average ± SEM, and individual values are plotted. *p < 0.05 using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

    Article Snippet: SA-coated RBCs were then incubated with 20 μg/mL biotinylated human IgG1 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1–96855) for 1 hr at 15°C while shaking.

    Techniques: Expressing, Functional Assay, Blocking Assay, Staining, shRNA, Control, Mutagenesis, Incubation

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: Inhibitory affinity modulation of FcγRIIA ligand binding by glycosphingolipids by inside-out signaling

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109142

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: SA-coated RBCs were then incubated with 20 μg/mL biotinylated human IgG1 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1–96855) for 1 hr at 15°C while shaking.

    Techniques: Purification, Control, Recombinant, Phagocytosis Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Knock-Out, Software

    a Overview of the detection of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion by flow-cytometric bead array. Streptavidin-coated microbeads with different fluorescence intensities are conjugated with recombinant biotinylated viral antigens (RBD, S1, and N) and mixed and incubated with pre-diluted serum samples together with control beads. After incubation, microbeads are washed and stained with anti-human IgG and IgM secondary antibodies, washed, and acquired on a flow cytometer for downstream analysis. Schematic created using BioRender.com. b Dot plots showing the staining patterns of positive (red) and negative (black) control beads with secondary anti-IgG-PE, anti-IgM-BV421, or both. The signal corresponding to IgG-PE (top) and IgM-BV421 (bottom) is shown for each column. c Histogram showing the distribution of the microbeads based on their intrinsic fluorescence on the APC channel. Each colour represents the coating for each microbead. d Representative dot plots showing the specificity of the staining pattern of recombinant anti-RBD IgG (left) or anti-N IgG (right) antibodies.

    Journal: Communications Biology

    Article Title: Sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion by flow cytometry reveals the presence of nucleoprotein-reactive antibodies in unexposed individuals

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02011-6

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Overview of the detection of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion by flow-cytometric bead array. Streptavidin-coated microbeads with different fluorescence intensities are conjugated with recombinant biotinylated viral antigens (RBD, S1, and N) and mixed and incubated with pre-diluted serum samples together with control beads. After incubation, microbeads are washed and stained with anti-human IgG and IgM secondary antibodies, washed, and acquired on a flow cytometer for downstream analysis. Schematic created using BioRender.com. b Dot plots showing the staining patterns of positive (red) and negative (black) control beads with secondary anti-IgG-PE, anti-IgM-BV421, or both. The signal corresponding to IgG-PE (top) and IgM-BV421 (bottom) is shown for each column. c Histogram showing the distribution of the microbeads based on their intrinsic fluorescence on the APC channel. Each colour represents the coating for each microbead. d Representative dot plots showing the specificity of the staining pattern of recombinant anti-RBD IgG (left) or anti-N IgG (right) antibodies.

    Article Snippet: Positive control beads were coated with biotinylated human IgG (Novus Biologicals Cat#NBP1-96855) and IgM (Novus Biologicals Cat#NBP1-96989) on the same microbead at 15 μg/mL each.

    Techniques: Fluorescence, Recombinant, Incubation, Control, Staining, Flow Cytometry